Uncategorized

Bill Nye The Red Pill Guy

Budding Red Pill knowledge on the manosphere is to behavioural science what bit like alchemy is to chemistry, informal theories are developed from informal observations of human behaviour until the science catches up with either a confirmation or refutation.

More often than not nowadays, science tends to come up with a confirmation of the principles that have already been discovered by Red Pill men, as Bill Nye here demonstrates by describing already well-known concepts in the manosphere in his thesis on the Science of Twerking.

Unlike the magical thinking dogmas of progressive idealogical systems Red Pill knowledge and neomasculinity is reality-based, which is why science confirms it so often.

Advertisements

Female Competition

378268db00000578-3754345-the_trend_was_started_by_a_meme_which_read_if_your_thighs_touch_-m-58_1471963256735

While you often hear “all bodies are beautiful” rhetoric from women, what is actually said and practiced by womenfolk can be quite different indeed. Look beyond the surface and you will start to see a lot of intragender competition going on.

A good specific case study of this would be all the furore over the tight gap in the femosphere. A lot has been said about the tight gap as a beauty idea for first-world women and how such “standards” are impossible or damaging. In response to the “damaging” tight gap standard, “real” women (those who don’t can’t achieve a beauty standard” are attempting to launch a counter-meme: The Mermaid Thighs.

Despite the obligatory “all bodies are beautiful” disclaimer at the beginning, the article and the pictures it chose to promote Mermaid Thighs quickly move into bashing the Tight Gap and why it’s better to have Mermaid Thighs, with various banal examples brought up as to why being Mermaid Thighs is invariably better.

So much for the “all bodies are beautiful” rhetoric. We see this quite often in other examples of female counter-memes that attempt to attack some oppressive beauty standard. The opening usually starts with how all bodies are equally attractive but quickly devolves into the bashing of the old standard and a frenzied hard-sell of why not being that is better.

d6b226ed100fd9101bda9e491b97c484

All this doublespeak may seem strange to a Blue Pill, but a Red Pill man will know that women are in constant competition with each other, with beauty standards being one of the many ways that they use to determine their own pecking order in the Sisterhood. Many of these beauty standards have little to do with attracting men at all, but are rather used as points for women to size each other up.

Attempts to sell non-conventional beauty standards such as fat acceptance, tattooed girls, dark skin, short hair and all those other things that “real women with real bodies” have aren’t done in the spirit of egalitarianism at all, but are rather attempted hostile takeovers by women considered less attractive by the sisterhood to redefine the rules to fit them better.

This isn’t too unlike how a reclusive MGTOW who does nothing with his life, an omega male who has zero success with women or soceity, or the effeminate Beta numan trying to redefine their own condition as the Masculine ideal. The difference is that women hide these attempts as redefinition under the guise of egalitarianism.

d32c5dd8848d185e42d02e3199d22f59

Note that men never asked for the tight gap as a beauty idea, nor do they find the existence of one a significant attractiveness buff or debuff. As a matter of fact men and women have quite different ideas of what is attractive in a woman, although men get blamed for most of it whenever there is any feelbadz. All this stuff and drama about the tight gap was quite literally created within the female sphere as a mean of social-capital ranking within the feminine social matrix.

So the next time a woman says “all bodies are beautiful”, remember that they most probably don’t mean it at all. The fat girl may say that all that in an attempt to reengineer social conditions to be more favourable to her, while the slim girl may say it so as to remain all PC with the added advantage hopefully the fat girls don’t self-improve. Their true attitudes on “all bodies beautiful” are quickly revealed the moment the fat girl starts attacking slim ones as being sticks while the slim girl sticks to her diet and exercise regime religiously.

Basic Red Pill 101: look at what women do, not what they say. Act accordingly.

Masculine Skills: Self Control

freaking-out


“Ender’s anger was cold, and he could use it.

Bonzo’s was hot, and so it used him. “

Ender’s Game


A close friend of mine has an issue with emotional self control and it has cost him greatly in his masculine journey. While he is generally a good guy, his one bad habit is having very poor control over his emotions, flipping out into fits of rage over things as inane as spilling the curry on his prata.

Unfortunately this emotional instability of his also carried over to his workplace as a teacher. While he was a good teacher and well loved by the students, his inability to contain his emotions often meant that he was on the short end of the stick when it came to office politics, becoming the scapegoat for the department. Losing your shit over stuff makes you look bad, no matter if you are in the right or wrong.

This also extended into his dating life, and it wasn’t so much his anger management issue that was the problem here but his inability to keep a stoic front, often wearing his heart on his sleeve or freaking out the moment things got a little serious, getting emotional and then bailing out. To this day he is single, and has never had a relationship in his life.

The masculine journey is a perilous one, and the thing that often scuttles a man’s bid to be the best that he can be is an inability to control his own emotions and letting them get the better of him.

Flipping out into fits of rage the moments things don’t go well, whining about difficulties, being overly soppy and sentimental, being overly-sensitive- these are hallmarks of a Blue Pill Beta male that signals to the entire world that he is a hapless man that is not in control of his own destiny.

In Singapore this often takes the form of whining about the government, whining about National Service, whining about how SPGs are sluts and can’t appreciate Asian men, whining about how life is tough and all that. A lack of emotional control is one of the reasons why many local Singaporean men are perceived as effeminate and weak. If you find yourself doing any of that, stop.

An Alpha male is in control over his emotions. He does not let many things get under his skin and only reserves anger for when it is appropriate. Even when he is angry, his anger is of the cold, calculated variety that is used it as a motivator to solve the problem as opposed to the histrionic hissy fit of a Beta.

Learn to control your emotions, be the rock in the storm. Don’t buy the claptrap being sold to you that men need to learn how to be sensitive. You will find that this pays many dividends in your work and social life.

Be the strong, silent man that is in control of his emotions.

Be Alpha.

Culling Men From The Cradle

1-crop-original-original

TL;DR: Lesbian parents attempt to raise their son in a “gender-neutral” way. Gender-neutral in this case means ham-fistedly attempting to batter down his natural, budding, masculine instincts.

“Gender neutral” parenting is the latest in-thing for progressives, since they are reaching peak-activism in individual progressive signalling. What better way to one-up your progressive Joneses by using your children as guinea pigs for your latest progressive fad?

What many avante-grade progressives don’t get when they attempt to raise their sons “gender-neutral” is that civilisational-building masculinity is a journey, an aspiration, and something which is not easy for boys to achieve if left to their own devices, much less if their “parents” are beating them over the head with PC progressive gender fluid boilerplate. But of course, progressive parents are the kind that don’t really like masculinity.

Rabbits don’t like masculinity. Masculinity is competitive by nature and seeks to sort the strong from the weak, which goes against the Rabbit mindset. Hence what better way to reduce the number of Wolves by culling any Wolf-instincts in the general population from the cradle?

The rabbits laugh at masculinity now because they live far insulated from the horrors of the big bad world by the institutions provided to them by the historical labours of masculine men that went before them and did the dirty work of building and maintaining the comfortable civillisation that they live in.

But things will be less funny for the rabbitkin when the lack of traditionally masculine men becomes acute from their cradle-culling and they facing impending invasion from more energetic and aggressive rival civillisation.

At that point the rabbits will realise that they need their wolves, but it will be too late to turn back the clock.

Men Are Not Equal

tallvsshortman

Equality is an aspiration, it is not reality, it is not practical”

Those words were uttered by Lee Kuan Yew in 2009 and they caused quite a bit of butthurt among the liberal Singaporean crowd, of which I was one during my Beta White Knight days. How dare someone say that! What is he implying?

And then now, 7 years later, I realise that old man was quite right.

Men are not equal.

People are different in ability, values, culture and virtue, and all this leads to different outcomes.

The progressive narrative demands that they are. The progressive narrative demands that all differences in outcome are due to discrimination. The progressive narrative demands outcomes be equalised by any means necessary.

Here’s something a little more controversial- many of these differences are innate, the result of what nature has given us through genetics. Some people will be taller, some people will be smarter, some people will be stronger than others.

What’s more, as many of these differences are given by nature, we tend to see a clustering of traits among various ethnic groups. Different populations have grown up in different environments and have adapted to their various environmental contexts. The gene lines that didn’t work out didn’t get passed on.

Even nurture conspires to reenforce cultural values and practices that worked in those environments over generations. Very often this nurture works in concert with nature in a symbiotic, mutually reenforcing relationship with each other. Genes create innate instincts that eventually form culture, and culture reenforces and selects for those genes in a population.

What this means is that different groups of people will be different (duh), but these differences aren’t benign or just cosmetic as much as the progressive would like you to believe, they have very real implications for how a population group will compete in a modern, increasingly globalised world.

Some groups will be better than others because they have better innate abilities that are better suited to the modern, connected world. Some groups will be better because they have cultural values that give positive outcomes more reliably.

And that means the less able, the less culturally functional will get the short end of the stick.

Men are not equal, that’s just the way reality works.

The progressive demands that they are, and attempts to equalise all outcomes no matter how dysfunctional these attempts are to the overall endeavour of civillisation. They will demand that wealth and resources be taken from functional people and given to dysfunctional ones. They will demand that dysfunctional behaviours, practices and cultures be regarded with as much virtue as functional ones.

All in the name of progressive equality.

To further cover over the stark clash that progressive equalist ideology has with brutal reality, the progressive goes further to push the idea of race and gender creationism- that all these things are just constructs, that all people are inherently innately equal in ability and that all observable inequality of outcomes is due to evil discrimination from the winning group.

All the problems losing groups have necessarily come from racism, sexism, classism, and whatever “ism” that they can come up with.

But at the end of the day, the progressive may try hard as they might, but reality will still eventually have its say at the end of the day when the system finally comes crashing down when the progressive pumping operation to equalise all outcomes finally causes too many problems to be sustained.

Men are not equal, nature is the greatest fascist, and has made it so.

In the manosphere we don’t believe in equality because that’s not how reality works. Not all cultures are equal in value for finding particular outcomes. Not all men are the same in ability. Competition will eventually lead to winners and losers.

The manosphere teaches you to be aware of your strengths and weaknesses and form a rational, practical and coherent plan to best achieve what you can within those limitations. There is no shying away from reality to believe one is awesome just because they are wish themselves to be.

This means being realistic with yourself and with reality, this means seeing things for what they really are.

If you want to be an masculine Asian man in Singapore, you need to see your true strengths and weaknesses. What is responsible for the stereotypes that render Asian men unattractive? Are you adding to any of them? Is there anything you can practically do to defy or work around them?

The Beta Singaporean Asian male or SJW will just whine about White privilege and assume that they are entitled to whatever they enviously see Caucasians enjoy because they assume everything ought to be equal.

But things are not, and that’s the way they are. If you really want

You may have been given limits by your natural biology, but you can utilise them to the maximum of your physical potential. You may have been raised in a culture that attempts to turn you into an unattractive, compliant Beta male but you can use Red Pill truths to find the right ideas and practices to achieve the outcomes you want.

This is what the manosphere advocates- realistic, reality-based approaches towards finding the outcome you want.

Men are not equal, but every man can be the best that he can be.

 

Narrative Breaking

This caused a bit of a stir on the interwebz a couple of months back, long story short- man praises his wife for being a submissive spouse that supports him in his marriage, gets both accolades and brickbats for that.

This man does not to give any indication of being Red Pill, but it appears that he missed most of the memos about expected Blue Pill behaviour from men since birth and somehow stumbled onto his own working theory of what a man should look for in a spouse and how he should conduct his marriage. Here’s his post in total, poor command of english and all:

 

untitled-5
THIS LADY SIMPLY LEFT ME SPEECHLESS.

MANY OF MY FRIENDS ACTUALLY CAME TO ME AND ASKED “JERALD, WHY DID YOU SETTLE DOWN SO EARLY?”

IN MY MIND, I THOUGHT, “SO EARLY” IS RELATIVE. 25 YEARS OLD CAN BE EARLY TO SOME, CAN BE LATE TO OTHERS. BUT TO ME, I FIND THAT THE SETTLING DOWN AT THE AGE OF 25 IS PERFECT. THE WORLD WILL SHIFT AND ALIGN FOR A MADE UP MIND… 先成家,再立业 … SETTLE DOWN EARLY AND FOCUS MY ENERGY ON MY BUSINESS …

SO LET ME SHARE WITH YOU WHY I CHOSE HER…

SHE IS A SUBMISSIVE WIFE. WAIT A MINUTE… BEFORE YOU THINK I’M MCP… LET ME CLARIFY… SHE IS SOMEONE WHO REALLY KNOWS HOW TO TAKE CARE OF ME. A WIFE WHO SAYS THAT SHE WANTS TO COOK FOR ME… (MAJORITY OF THE LADIES NOWADAYS DON’T BOTHER WITH HOUSEHOLD CHORES OR COOK FOR THEIR HUSBAND HAHA… NO WAY… HER MUM BROUGHT HER UP WELL.) AND BOTHERS TO WAKE UP EARLY IN THE MORNING TO PREPARE BREAKFAST FOR ME. SHE GIVES ME VIP TREATMENT EVERY DAY. THAT’S MY EX-GIRLFRIEND. MY CURRENT WIFE…

SHE IS VERY WILLING IS SUBMIT TO ME. A LOT OF PEOPLE DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE POWER WHEN SHE DOES THAT. THE POWER OF SUBMISSION ISN’T WHERE YOU KOWTOW TO SOMEONE OR OPEN THE DOOR FOR THEM. IT IS JUST SUBMITTING TO A COMMON MISSION WHERE THERE IS AN ABSENCE OF REBELLION.

THE MISSION WE ARE IN IS TO LEAD A PROSPEROUS, UNITED AND BLISSFUL FAMILY. SHE IS WHOLEHEARTEDLY WILLING TO LET ME BE THE HEAD OF THE HOME AND CHOOSE TO PLAY THE MOST IMPORTANT ROLE IN MY LIFE (MY NECK). UNKNOWINGLY, WHEN SHE CHOOSES TO SUBMIT TO ME, SURPRISINGLY, SHE HAS THE POWER.

ALLOW ME TO EXPLAIN WITH AN EXAMPLE. WHEN A MENTOR TRIES TO IMPART WHAT HE KNOWS TO HIS MENTEE, IF THE MENTEE CHOOSES TO QUESTION EVERYTHING HE SAID, THE MENTOR KNOWS THIS PERSON IS NOT COACHABLE. SIMPLY BECAUSE THERE IS NO TRUST AND THE MENTEE HAS NOT SUBMITTED TO HIM.

ON THE OTHER HAND, IF THE MENTEE CHOOSES TO DO WHATEVER (EXCEPT ANYTHING ILLEGAL, IMMORAL, UNETHICAL) THE MENTOR SAYS, THE MENTEE HAS THE POWER BECAUSE THE MENTOR WILL FEEL BE EVEN MORE OBLIGATED TO HELP THAT MENTEE. SO WHEN MY WIFE SUBMITS TO BE, ALL THE MORE I WILL LISTEN TO HER.

AT THE END OF THE DAY, MEN WANT RESPECT (WHICH HE GETS WHEN A WOMAN SUBMITS), WOMEN WANT LOVE (THEY WANT THE MAN TO DO WHATEVER TO MAKE HER HAPPY) … GIVE LOVE AND YOU SHALL RECEIVE RESPECT…

THAT’S WHY I TURN DOWN INVITATIONS TO GO DRINKING. I HAVE GOT A GOOD LIQUOR TOLERANCE BECAUSE OF MY DAD BUT I DON’T LIKE TO DRINK. I PREFER TO STAY HOME AND NOT WORRY MY LOVED ONE. I WANT TO STAY HEALTHY AND ENJOY MY WEALTH IN THE FUTURE.

I CHOOSE TO SPEND THAT TIME WITH MY WIFE. THESE ARE THE WAYS I SUBMIT TO HER TOO BECAUSE ONE OF HER “LOVE LANGUAGES” IS TIME.

TAKE A LOOK AT THIS TEXT SENT BY HER!!

1618349_10153425121374599_8680806517403394827_o

ALWAYS SO SWEET AND TAKE SO MUCH INITIATIVE TO MAKE ME FEEL LOVED.

BTW, LOVE IS AN ACTION WORD. NOT A NOUN!

 

Shots fired! Shots fired! How many Red Pill ideas do you see there?

Obviously this did not go down with the majority of careerist empowered strong feminist women and for good reason, this guy just blatantly ignores all of the socially mandated, feminist approved attributes of what a Blue Pill man should look for in a woman and just goes for whatever he judges to be good for himself.

He practically ignores all of what feminism attempts to sell as attractiveness in a woman nowadays. Sassy, independent and Beyonce-gurl power as the kind of woman every “man” should go for? This guy ain’t got no time for that.

And what’s more he has the temerity to be happy about all that, although his gushing praise of his wife does lean into the beta a fair bit, not to mention his body posture in the selfies. This guy isn’t an alpha by any measure, but he somehow manages not to drink the Blue Pill kool-aid most betas do.

This guy simply didn’t get the progressive equality memo, avoided all of the pitfalls and traps that modern feminism tosses out to him in the marketplace, gets what he wants and is happy with it.

Now marriage is a long game and the success of his union will take a lot of hard work, but he has the formative ideas and relationship posture right, which is more than we can say about the masses of hapless betas who constantly wonder why they can’t get woman.

Another thing to note as well, from his account it does appear that his in-laws raised his wife in the ways of femininity and taught her that she needs to offer a complementary value proposition in the union as well, as opposed to the typical entitled princesses we have today that expect things to lean their way all the time. This woman is happy to do things that feminists consider beneath them for her husband. She sees it not as slavery but as her value proposition to the marriage. The heresy! This slavery is supposed to be unhappy!

No wonder the feminists and stronk empowerz gurls are unhappy, this couple basically defies all of their conventions, narratives and hallowed beliefs and dare to be happy.  This guy shows that even average chump betas can thwart all the demands of hypergamy if they just have a few right ideas about what woman to choose and what posture and model they want to conduct their relationships in.

This is what they are afraid of, people breaking the progressive gender equality narrative and showing that on the whole, they are much happier doing that than trying to live out feminist boilerplate ideology.

This is also why they will hate and fear you if you are a Red Pill that dares to be happier, more productive and successful than your Blue Pill counterparts. Feminism attempts to sell the lie that men will be happier as compliant, sacrificial Blue Pills that do what they are told for the exclusive benefit of women, no questions asked.

You are a contradiction to all that.

You are showing a better way, you are breaking their narrative.

 

Harassment and The Imperative

The Social Justice movements of the regressive left have been trying to make inroads into Singapore in the past few years, with the the local chapter recruiting their acolytes mainly from the younger liberal demographic of the sunny republic.

A fair bit of media and creative professionals are most certainly of the SJW persuasion- in fact having an SJW merit badge is almost a requirement on the unofficial CV of social proofs needed to be in those circles.

While the environment in Singapore is far less welcome for special snowflake SJWs that require exact and delicate conditions to blossom, there have been some luminaries who have been doing their best to introduce American style regressive identity-politics.

Among the notable are Sangeetha Thanapal “creator” of the the term-swapped copypasta privilege theories, post-colonialist “experts” Chinese allies like Adeline Koh, poets such as Grace Chia smashing the patriachary by protesting the winners of the Singapore Literature Prize’s English Poetry being all male and what have you not.

Competition is stiff if you want to be a luminary in the field of progressiveness. Enter Kristen Han, literal card carrying feminist and journalist. Famous for protesting oppressive things such as benefits for NSmen, she now attempts to make a latest addition to her SJW CV- denouncing a radio DJ’s statements for advocating sexual harassment:

Screen Shot 2016-07-07 at 4.16.31 pm

You know you are watching a luminary of local journalism in action when you see “FFS”.

Long story short, local woman is allegedly verbally abused by a wacko claiming to be an Israeli having problems with her skin colour on a bus. Investigations are ongoing while the woman gets an interview on local radio. Radio DJ makes a joke about wanting to hit on the woman instead of physically hitting her. Kirsten Han is triggered.

The interwebz exploded over this, but most of the response appears to be largely negative with people decrying Kristen’s rather low bar for what is considered harassment. Maybe she intended to make a more nuanced point beyond painting all instances of “hitting on” as “Harassment FFS”, but nevertheless it is pretty typical feminist boilerplate on harassment.

Kristen isn’t exactly saying anything new, but this little nugget of interwebz drama is an interesting data point in how local SJWs are trying to import western style social justice here, so it’s good to be aware. Fortunately, there is a lack of local hackjob media mouthpieces to carry her rhetoric too far, with most of it being focused on anti-establishment politics. But one cannot be certain that this will alway be the case. So be prepared.

A Blue Pill man would feel a pang of guilt at her post and think something like “Not all men are like that! I have to prove to others I am not like those!”, those of you in the manosphere however, should know better and understand the underlying dynamics that drive such rhetoric from feminists.

Present day post-modern feminism pushes it’s rhetoric on many fronts- everything is sexist, everything is oppressive, women are disenfranchised by everything from men sitting with their legs apart to the air conditioner being too cold. But under all the rhetoric is an drive to maximise the feminine imperative at the expense of the masculine imperative. Understand these dynamics and a lot of feminist boilerplate takes on a new light.

For a quick primer on the feminine imperative do read up on the various manosphere articles on it, there are plenty of excellent ones. Basically the feminine imperative is the female mating prime directive in which a woman is compelled to seek out a mate with as high a value as possible, having maximal opportunities to trade up when another higher quality male comes alone. This is also what we call hypergamy in the manosphere.

Much of the feminist rhetoric on harrasment attempting to set as low a bar as possible to define it is less about about setting up social institutions and conventions to deter low-status males from making an approach. The feminine imperative demands it.

Low status males are useful as resources and labour, but never as romantic prospects. The innate disgust of being approached by a low status male draws from the decrease in social rank and insecurity a woman suffers as a result. Too many approaches from low status males and she starts questioning if she’s so unattractive that the subpar men think they have a chance with her.

“What? How dare you think you are in my league!” So goes the logic.

As such, women have a deep revulsion about being approached by men they consider under their sociosexual  rank. It is an affront to the feminine imperative. The impulse to protect the imperative is so strong that it drives feminists to agitate for social institutions to deter approaches from low ranked men. A lot of the justifications attempting to redefine harassment on as low a bar as possible come from retroactive reasoning to justify their innate reactions under the feminine imperative.

Would Kristen, or many women of her feminist persuasion react negatively to a charming, high status man hitting on her? Would she post a heated status result about how she was harassed by George Clooney? One might think the reactions would be different.

Feminists want their subjective reality to be considered objective reality by everyone.

When they say they do not want to be hit on what they really mean is that they don’t want to be hit on by men they don’t find attractive.

One can take away a lot of lessons from this little piece of local drama on the interwebz. Firstly it’s that SJWism is slowly but surely trying to make its way into Singapore- maybe it will die out before it finds any roots as the cultural contexts for Singapore are too different for a bunch of upper-middle class english educated latte liberals to overwhelm. They just don’t understand how most Singaporeans actually think.

But one will always do well to be vigilant- just look at how far SJWs have managed to co-opt movements like Pink Dot.

The other is that this is a useful case study in feminist rhetoric and the underlying logic of the feminine imperative that drives it. As a Red Pill man your job is to stick to your masculine frame and resist feminist attempts to redefine the terms. Deny the reality of their subjective experience and show to others what a terrible idea it is (for men especially) to be subject to the subjective emotional whims of women on a societal scale.

First harassment is just hitting on a woman, soon it will be just looking at a woman, soon it will be just to be near a woman. You’ve seen it happen in the west, don’t let it come to pass here.

And as a final take away. Here is one chap trying to hit on a woman, but under two different presentations. Which one is harassment? Watch and learn some Red Pill truths:

 

 

Taking Stock

20150119_0027311

One of the first things you need to do before coming up with a life action plan as part of your masculine journey is to form an accurate picture of your weaknesses, strengths and opportunities (in that order). This is important.

Many a man with potential has been scuttled by having an inaccurate idea of himself, overestimating his own competence in many areas and failing because he was unaware of his weaknesses. Aim high but have a realistic picture of yourself, your terrain and your situation.

Which is why I recommend starting from weaknesses- it is all too easy to live in denial or ignore them. Self-confidence is good, but being delusional about your abilities is not. Take stock of what you need to do.

Is your physical fitness lacking? Time to get on the ball with your physical training regimen. Do you lack confidence? Practice your social skills. Are you currently in a dead end job with lifestyle choices that will lead nowhere? Get off your ass and do something about it. Unsure about who are your real friends and enemies? Go make sure, don’t assume.

Taking the red pill means coming to terms with reality in aspects, many stop at just coming to a realisation of externalities. Yes red pill knowledge about female nature is useful but it isn’t as useful as realising red pill truths about yourself. Too many men stop at just being satisfied with red pill truths in Game to get more notches on their bedposts. This is not an action plan that is sustainable or good for the long game. Think about the bigger picture, not just getting popular with women. This will be your legacy.

Indeed, the manosphere has moved on since the early days of just learning red pill truths to master pickup. The key thinkers in it have moved into considering the implications of the red pill for life, society and civilisation, and with that a man’s place in it.

So master your weaknesses to be better at life in all aspects, not just because you wish to be better at intergender relations. Your life is about the mission, not the girl.

Next recognise your strengths and capitalise on them.  Are you good at speaking and a master of rhetoric? Use those to forward your masculine journey, help unplug your fellow men and fight the wave of degeneracy coming from the allure of regressive ideology. Are you a good organiser? Start organising and rallying your fellow masculine men so that you all can help each other through life. Know what your talents are and use these strengths to generate more possibilities.

And finally take stock of your opportunities. Be quiet and observe your environment and situation. There are always opportunities to better your own position and that of your brothers. Approach them using full awareness of your weaknesses and strengths to best exploit these.

A masculine man is antifragile- his approaches his weaknesses and strengths in such a way that adversity only makes him stronger at the end of it. This is in contrast to the hordes of liberal special snowflakes with overly inflated notions of themselves who demand that others serve them success and self-actualisation on a platter.

Being a red pill man means you see reality for what it is, and that also means you need to be honest with yourself. Take stock.